Friday, October 10, 2008

Modular Homes
A reader asked about these and I'll have more to say on them later (I like them, if they're made well, customized and erected by a good, experienced builder). In the meantime, here's an older column from my archived newspaper column (which is supposed to be linked to the current post and, for some reason, is not -I'll work on that, too):
May 14, 2004
A New House
A builder named Dave Tilly is building a new house on Irvine Street in Old Greenwich that’s worthy of mention for a number of reasons. First is its design. While I mourn the loss of so many small cottages in town, buyers today want larger houses, and builders, if they expect to stay in business, must comply. That said, this house, to my eye, fits into the streetscape very nicely, neither dwarfing the cottage next door nor crowding its own lot. Tilly speaks of ratios and proportions like an old Greek architect, and he’s achieved it here. Second is quality. The poured foundation is set on a foot of gravel, with an air system underneath the concrete floor that creates a negative airflow, sucking out any damp air. The furnace is a new German design so efficient (97%, compared to the usual 85%) that its exhaust gets blown out via a fan – it is too cool to rise on its own. That’s just the basement. Upstairs, the sheathing is plywood, not oriented strandboard, the shingles are hand dipped, Alaskan yellow cedar which, unlike its less expensive cousin, eastern cedar, bleaches grey, not black. The fenestration is by Marvin, there is custom millwork and cabinetry throughout the house and, all in all, it’s obvious that the building is being erected by a fussy, detail-oriented perfectionist. The third reason to take note of this house is that forty percent of it is (gasp!) modular – built in a factory by Haven Homes and shipped to the site. Despite what you may have read elsewhere about the poor quality of such construction, the only differences I can see between a “stick built” house and this one are the speed with which the initial building blocks went up and the craftsmanship in this one: it’s far better than most stick-builts. In evaluating a home, its place of construction —factory vs. on site— is irrelevant; it is the quality of construction you should worry about because, as they say in the computer business, garbage in, garbage out. Dave Tilly’s house is a finely-crafted piece of building which will still look good decades from now.


Update 10/10/08
The house sold for a then record price for that street and resold for even more a couple of years later.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Chris, modular homes are nothing more than boxes stacked on boxes. Like a stack of shoeboxes, in theory, they should remain stable forever. In practice, however, modular homes settle and shift, like all new construction. The problem is that the boxes tend to exaggerate this settling. Visit a 10 year old modular home, and I'll bet you'll be surprised at the gaps, where boxes have pulled away, and humps and troughs, where boxes have settled.
I'm a hardwood floor contractor, and I've been called in to fix more than a few of these. The problem is, however, it's stuctural.
Little of this matters much, because the economics of a modular construction make more and more sense in todays market.
I enjoy your writing....thanks for your honesty.